You can choose a password length of not more than 50 characters. Do not forget to switch keyboard layout to the English. Do not choose a password too simple, less then 4 characters, because such a password is easy to find out. Allowed latin and !@#$%^&*()_-+=., characters
Create Free Account
Already have an account? Enter
Please enter all the fields
Incorrect login or password entered
Forgot your password?
Don’t have an account? Create Account
Forgot your password?
Please enter your Email
This Email is not registered in Simkl
Failed to send email, try again later
Don't worry. It's easy to reset.
Please enter your Simkl username or E-mail from your account to start the password recovery process.
We have sent instructions to the email address you provided during signup. Please follow the link from the email to continue.
while at comic con in san diego last summer i sat in the massive hall h and watched paramount pictures present their upcoming slate of movies. one movie that took me by surprise was project almanac. the footage they showed made it look awesome. it kind of looked like chronicle. i couldn't wait for it to come out.
and what a disappointment it turned out to be. dumb as all hell, with things that make no sense. how did the writers, the producers and the director let these things slide? two examples? one, a shirt with a massive stain on it is worn again, without being cleaned months later and that is the crucial clue for our character? two, going back in time to fix a problem over and over again yet not encountering the gazillion versions of yourself doing this?
time travel movies are hard to do. they are hard to make the logic sound and the story work. the people behind this film didn't even try to make it work. then they chose to shot it found footage style. why? it makes no sense in the context of the film. why would they be shooting certain things? why would they be at these certain angles? and lastly why shoot in the cinematic aspect ratio of 2.35:1 if it is found footage? makes the found footage idea feel even less needed. this should of been a perspective movie, as in from the perspective of the characters, through their eyes. at least that would of made sense.
it's also pretty boring. there is way to much scenes of people doing nothing. just talking. not enough action or sci-fi. just when you think it's getting better there is another dry spell of needless exposition or just nothing happening.
dumb, dumb, dumb... what a disappointment.... bad, bad, bad... it had cool effects and sound though? does that mean anything? no, no, no...
production design: 8 out of 10
cinematography: 5 out of 10
re-playability: 3 out of 10
originality: 4 out of 10
costumes: 6 out of 10
directing: 5 out of 10
editing: 6 out of 10
acting: 6 out of 10
music: 6 out of 10
script: 3 out of 10
Topic is a specific subject of discussion.
Optional, please keep it short.
Drop image files here or click to upload
max 10MB photo or 2MB GIF
Add photo or GIF from web
How to add photo or GIF from
You can paste URL of the image inside
your comment and it will be
automatically converted into the image
when reading the comment.
Find a GIF
Create a Meme
How to add a video:
To add a video paste video url directly into your comment. Example:
Do not post links to copyrighted video content (TV Episodes,
Movies). Share them privately if