You can choose a password length of not more than 50 characters. Do not forget to switch keyboard layout to the English. Do not choose a password too simple, less then 4 characters, because such a password is easy to find out. Allowed latin and !@#$%^&*()_-+=., characters
Create Free Account
Already have an account? Enter
Please enter all the fields
Incorrect login or password entered
Forgot your password?
Don’t have an account? Create Account
Forgot your password?
Please enter your Email
This Email is not registered in Simkl
Failed to send email, try again later
Don't worry. It's easy to reset.
Please enter your Simkl username or E-mail from your account to start the password recovery process.
We have sent instructions to the email address you provided during signup. Please follow the link from the email to continue.
man was i ever excited about this film (both parts actually). i missed it in theatres and have wanted to see it ever since. why? well there is the cast, there is the director and there is the sex. not just any sex but lots of hardcore real sex. yes i know, i'm a perv. sue me.
i love von trier and i love gainsbourg and skarsgard and so many others in this film. i love art house films. i love sex and nudity. i figured this movie would be right up my ally.
so i watched vol. 1 yesterday (these are not the director's cuts which i will watch later when i get them. they are the theatrical cuts which von trier did not edit. after careful research i came to the conclusion - as i usually watch the director's preferred version - that i would of seen these versions in the theatre so why not watch it at home.
so what did i think? well i liked the film. it was funny and somewhat sad and a little erotic. it kept my attention the whole time it played (with no music) and it had beautiful cinematography which was awesome. and the sex, lots of it (but not as much as i thought) was great and sexy and sometimes erotic and sometimes not.
i also thought the story was a little weak. maybe the second half will make it stronger but as a film on its own it doesn't really do or tell much. it kind of feels like a bunch of scenes put together that never go anywhere (yet). it also likens, it seems, nymphomania to fishing. maybe that's the whole idea of the film, that nymphomania is not that bad and it is as good a hobby as fishing. for such an extreme boundry pushing movie it really doesn't have much to say (yet).
still, it's an enjoyable two hours and i look forward to vol. 2.
production design: 8 out of 10
cinematography: 9 out of 10
re-playability: 6 out of 10
originality: 8 out of 10
costumes: 8 out of 10
directing: 8 out of 10
editing: 8 out of 10
acting: 9 out of 10
music: 8 out of 10
script: 7 out of 10
Topic is a specific subject of discussion.
Optional, please keep it short.
Drop image files here or click to upload
max 10MB photo or 2MB GIF
Add photo or GIF from web
How to add photo or GIF from
You can paste URL of the image inside
your comment and it will be
automatically converted into the image
when reading the comment.
Find a GIF
Create a Meme
How to add a video:
To add a video paste video url directly into your comment. Example:
Do not post links to copyrighted video content (TV Episodes,
Movies). Share them privately if