The Twelve season 1 episode 3 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
Frie Palmers faces trial for two murders: her friend Brechtje and her daughter Roos. Amidst a troubled past with her ex-husband Stefaan and tensions with a woman named Margot, evidence against Frie includes a suspicious letter and a fingerprint. The jury, including Holly Ceusters—whose parents were murdered years ago—grapples with the evidence and personal biases. Meanwhile, a construction site incident highlights legal and moral dilemmas. As the trial progresses, doubts about Frie's guilt emerge, reflecting the complex nature of justice and truth.
Full Episode S01E03 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Frie Palmers accused of murdering?
Frie Palmers is accused of murdering her best friend, Brechtje Vindevogel, and her daughter, Roos.
What is the Millennium Trial?
The Millennium Trial is the court case in which Frie Palmers is being tried for the two murders she is accused of.
Who is Stefaan in relation to Frie?
Stefaan is Frie's ex-husband, with whom she had a very troubled marriage.
Who is Margot and what is her relationship to Frie?
Margot is a woman involved in the case, whom Frie had hired as a teacher at her school and views as a hypocrite.
Who is Holly Demeulemeester?
Holly Demeulemeester, who now goes by Holly Ceusters, is a juror in the Millennium Trial. Her parents were murdered eight years ago.
What significant event happened at a construction site?
An illegal immigrant collapsed at the construction site, leading to an investigation that highlights Bjorn's management challenges.
What was the outcome of the custody battle over Roos?
The court granted Stefaan full custody of Roos, allowing Frie only very limited visitation rights.
How was the crime against Roos discovered?
A 911 call was made reporting that Roos had been cut and was covered in blood, leading to immediate suspicion of a violent attack.
What evidence is there against Frie Palmers?
Evidence includes a fingerprint at the crime scene, a threatening letter allegedly written by Frie, and her history of confrontations.
How do the jurors react to the evidence presented in the trial?
The jurors express mixed feelings, with some questioning the reliability of the evidence and others being swayed by it against Frie.
What personal struggles do jury members face during the trial?
Jury members, including Carl and Holly, face personal biases and challenges, such as Carl's issues with his ex-wife and Holly's past trauma.
Is there any doubt about Frie Palmers' guilt among the jury members?
Yes, some jury members express doubt about Frie's guilt, especially in light of the evidence and how it is presented during the trial.
How does Frie's defense counter the accusations against her?
Frie's defense challenges the credibility of the evidence, suggesting that it could have been manipulated and questioning the police's focus on Frie.
What role does Holly Ceusters play in the jury?
Holly Ceusters, formerly Demeulemeester, serves as a juror, and her background as the daughter of murdered parents adds complexity to her role.
What are the implications of the construction site incident?
The incident brings legal scrutiny to Bjorn's management practices and highlights the risks associated with employing illegal immigrants.