The Guardian season 3 episode 2 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
In a dense weave of legal and ethical dilemmas, Nick and Burton navigate the murky waters of corporate law, tackling a negligent homicide charge for Hostetler and confronting the complex task of securing waivers from Vernon residents against future property damage due to a coal fire. Amidst professional negotiations and personal entanglements, including Nick's affair with Sadie Harper and the firm's internal conflicts, the episode delves into the moral compromises and personal costs of legal success. The resolution leaves the characters and the firm deeper in ethical quandaries, reflecting on the nature of their work and the impact on affected communities.
Full Episode S03E02 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does Burton list as clients of Mathers Industries?
Kelton Rubber, Nathanson Auto Parts, Henderson Box and Paper, Bluestone Plastics, L&T Holding Corporation, Rightvision Communications, Sklar Chemical, and Allegheny Electric.
What is the relationship between Burton and Nick?
Burton offers Nick a 50% share for future clients that Nick brings in, changing their professional agreement.
Who is Hostetler and what legal trouble does he face?
Hostetler faced a negligent homicide charge due to a teenager dying in one of his mines, which was resolved with a minor fine.
What task is Nick assigned regarding Vernon?
Nick is tasked with securing waivers from Vernon residents to mitigate future property damage claims due to a nearby coal fire.
Who is Sadie Harper and what is her role in Vernon?
Sadie Harper is a criminal attorney who worked on Hostetler's defense and is familiar with Vernon. She assists Nick in convincing residents to sign waivers.
What ethical concerns arise during the Vernon mission?
The mission involves convincing residents to waive future claims against potential property damage, raising ethical concerns about their rights and well-being.
How does the firm's relationship with Hostetler evolve?
Despite the ethical dilemmas faced in Vernon, the firm is drawn into more legal challenges on behalf of Hostetler, complicating their professional integrity.
