The Practice season 2 episode 26 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
In a high-stakes trial, the defense employs a controversial strategy, suggesting their client, entangled in a murder case, was Lizzie Borden in a past life. Key witness Dr. Peters testifies about past life regression therapy, complicating the case with the revelation of his affair with the defendant. Skepticism from mock jurors and ethical dilemmas challenge the defense team, leading to a dramatic courtroom incident that results in a mistrial. The case exposes the complexities of personal relationships, ethical boundaries, and the legal system, leaving a lasting impact on all involved.
Full Episode S02E26 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
What defense strategy is used in the case?
The defense uses a past life regression defense, suggesting the defendant was Lizzie Borden in a past life.
Who is Dr. Peters in relation to the case?
Dr. Peters is a key witness for the defense, testifying about the defendant's past life regression therapy.
What complicates the defense's strategy during the trial?
The revelation of an affair between the defendant and Dr. Peters complicates the defense's strategy.
How do the jurors initially react to the past life defense?
The mock jurors are skeptical of the past life defense, indicating it's a difficult strategy to sell.
What ethical dilemmas do the defense team face?
The defense team grapples with the ethical implications of their defense strategy and the revelation of the affair.
How does the trial conclude?
The trial ends in a mistrial due to a violent outburst in the courtroom.
What impact does the case have on the defense team?
The case takes an emotional and ethical toll on the defense team, leading to reflection on their methods and the legal system.
Is the past life defense successful?
The effectiveness of the past life defense is left uncertain due to the trial's abrupt end in a mistrial.
What role does personal relationships play in the case?
Personal relationships, particularly the affair between the defendant and Dr. Peters, significantly impact the case's dynamics and the defense's strategy.
Does the defendant admit to the murder?
The defendant does not remember committing the murder, suggesting a blackout during the incident.
What evidence is presented against the defendant?
Evidence includes forensic evidence linking the defendant to the murder and eyewitness testimony.
How does the defense team plan to rehabilitate Dr. Peters' credibility?
The defense considers putting Dr. Peters back on the stand to counteract the damage done by the revelation of his affair.
What is the reaction to Dr. Peters' testimony about past lives?
Dr. Peters' testimony about past lives causes a stir in the courtroom, with varied reactions from spectators and the jury.
How does the case affect Ellenor's personal life?
Ellenor's personal life is impacted by her relationship with a man connected to another plot involving the defense team, complicating matters.
What is the final outcome for the defendant?
The final outcome for the defendant remains uncertain due to the mistrial, leaving the effectiveness of the past life defense untested.
