Borgen season 3 episode 3 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
Birgitte forms a new political party, focusing on integration policy and struggling with financial challenges. She recruits the first member of parliament but faces distrust from Jon Berthelsen. The team debates the selection of an integration spokesperson, considering various candidates with diverse backgrounds. A significant donation from banker Jorgen Steen Andersen leads to ethical concerns about policy influence. Personal and professional tensions surface, culminating in Birgitte's firm stance against extreme views and emphasizing clear, consistent policies.
Full Episode S03E03 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
Who establishes a new political party?
Birgitte establishes a new political party.
Who is recruited as the first member of parliament for the new party?
An unnamed character is recruited as the first member of parliament.
What is the focus of the key discussions in the party?
The focus is on integration policy, party identity formation, and candidate selection.
What role is the party looking to fill?
The party is looking for a spokesperson on integration.
What kind of debates does TV1 want to host?
TV1 wants to host panel debates on integration policy.
Who is considered for the spokesperson role but ultimately not chosen?
Jawad Hammidi is considered but not chosen due to his tattoo and criminal record.
What financial challenge does the party face?
The party faces financial struggles and considers various funding sources.
Who offers a significant donation to the party?
Banker Jorgen Steen Andersen offers a significant donation.
What ethical dilemma does Birgitte face regarding the donation?
Birgitte faces an ethical dilemma about the donation possibly influencing the party's policy decisions.
How does Birgitte handle controversies within the party?
Birgitte takes a firm stand on policy direction and rejects extreme views.
What is the outcome of the spokesperson selection for integration?
The outcome is not explicitly stated, but there are challenges and controversies in the selection process.