The Big Valley season 2 episode 7 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
In a tumultuous confrontation with Joshua Hawks, a political candidate spreading false accusations, the Barkley family faces public scrutiny over their land's legitimacy. Hawks accuses them of theft, escalating tensions and threatening their business relationships. The Barkleys strategize a response, weighing legal action and public relations to defend their reputation. The conflict culminates in a dramatic revelation of Hawks' vendetta and personal grievances, leading to a showdown that resolves the accusations and reaffirms the Barkleys' integrity. Despite the ordeal, the Barkleys' resilience and unity help them navigate the challenges, ultimately preserving their legacy and business.
Full Episode S02E07 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Joshua Hawks?
Joshua Hawks is a political candidate who accuses the Barkleys of owning stolen land.
What are the accusations made against the Barkleys?
The accusations involve the Barkleys' land being obtained through theft by Thomas Barkley, the family patriarch.
How do the Barkleys respond to the accusations?
The Barkleys consider suing for libel and strategize on how to counter the negative publicity without giving Hawks more attention.
Does Hawks have proof of his accusations?
Hawks claims to have proof but is challenged to present it publicly, leading to tensions and confrontations.
What impact do the accusations have on the Barkleys' business?
The accusations cause business partners to hesitate in their dealings with the Barkleys, affecting their produce sales and reputation.
How does the conflict between the Barkleys and Hawks escalate?
The conflict escalates through public confrontations, a physical altercation, and Hawks' continued campaign against the Barkleys.
How is the conflict resolved?
The resolution involves a dramatic confrontation that brings to light the truth about Hawks' accusations and his personal vendetta against the Barkleys.
What does Victoria Barkley discover about Hawks' past?
Victoria discovers Hawks' past resentment towards the Barkleys, stemming from his time working on their land and feeling overlooked.
What are the repercussions of Hawks' campaign for governor?
Hawks' campaign, based on false accusations, ultimately fails, but not before causing significant distress and damage to the Barkleys' reputation.
How do the Barkleys plan to move forward after the accusations?
The Barkleys plan to rebuild their reputation and business, facing any remaining skepticism with proof of their land's legitimacy.
Is there a legal case against Hawks for his accusations?
The Barkleys consider a libel case, but the story focuses more on the court of public opinion and personal confrontation.
What is the community's reaction to the Barkleys and Hawks' conflict?
The community's reaction is mixed, with some swayed by Hawks' accusations and others standing by the Barkleys' reputation.
Do the Barkleys receive support from their business partners?
The Barkleys face initial hesitation from business partners, but the resolution of the conflict may restore confidence.
How does Hawks justify his accusations against the Barkleys?
Hawks justifies his accusations by claiming to fight against corruption and theft, though his motivations are revealed to be more personal and vindictive.
What lesson do the Barkleys learn from their ordeal with Hawks?
The Barkleys learn the importance of resilience, the impact of public perception, and the value of confronting false accusations directly.
